This site may earn affiliate commissions from the links on this page. Terms of use.

Brain-Machine-2

Stephen Hawking has spoken about the need to be extremely conscientious when developing or experimenting with artificial intelligence in the past and the famed physicist recently delivered some of his starkest language yet. Hawking recently spoke at a technology conference in Portugal, where he told the audience that maintaining control of artificial intelligence is absolutely paramount to keeping the human being race alive.

"Computers can, in theory, emulate human intelligence, and exceed it," Hawking said. "Success in creating effective AI, could be the biggest event in the history of our civilization. Or the worst. We merely don't know. So we cannot know if we will be infinitely helped by AI, or ignored past it and side-lined, or conceivably destroyed by it."

"AI could exist the worst upshot in the history of our civilization," Hawking continued. "It brings dangers, like powerful autonomous weapons, or new ways for the few to oppress the many. It could bring cracking disruption to our economy."

Elon Musk has also spoken out nearly the dangers of AI and the need to evaluate it very seriously.

Highly intelligent people accept had deep misgivings about engineering since literally before technology was a discussion. Socrates himself spoke out against the invention of writing by telling the story of a chat between Theuth, the Egyptian inventor of letters, and what the god-king of Egypt, Ammon, supposedly said to him:

[T]his discovery of yours will create forgetfulness in the learners' souls, considering they will not utilize their memories; they will trust to the external written characters and non remember of themselves. The specific which yous accept discovered is an aid not to retentivity, but to reminiscence, and you give your disciples not truth, but only the semblance of truth; they volition exist hearers of many things and volition take learned zero; they will appear to be omniscient and will mostly know nothing; they volition exist irksome company, having the show of wisdom without the reality.

One's first impulse, upon reading such dolorous prophecy, is to laugh. But Socrates had a betoken. Writing was fundamental to our advancement as a species, just it also reshaped civilisation. The invention of writing allowed philosophers and accountants alike to create lasting tallies and recordings of their works, whether that meant a detailed list of ingather yields along the Nile River or philosophic arguments we however discuss today.

Socrates may have missed the improvements that writing would create, but he wasn't incorrect about it transforming culture. The invention of books aided the dissemination of knowledge by making it much easier to behave information in a single tome as opposed to a large number of scrolls. The printing printing, of course, revolutionized education and brought books to the masses (eventually) in a manner even the well-nigh far-reaching visionaries of late antiquity could scarcely have imagined. And these transformations continue–there have already been studies on how the net's always-nowadays fountain of cognition is changing how we remember things.

Hawking'southward fearfulness that AI could hands turn against those who create it is not unfounded. Many people have a view of artificial intelligence and the infallibility of computers that is blatantly at odds with the existent-world reality of these devices. Modern medicine has gotten pretty skilful at fixing physical problems within the body, but mental wellness treatments are much more difficult–and we've been trying to fix people's mental health issues for thousands of years. Until the 20th century, our "best" treatments involved amateur encephalon surgery, horrifying insulin comas, and alternating forced baths in freezing and scalding h2o. Now, imagine trying to talk an AI "down off the ledge" when it's feeling suicidal and happens to have nuclear launch codes in its back pocket.

That said, Hawking is all the same an optimist nigh the possibility of the applied science–he's merely simultaneously very concerned about what could happen if we underestimate the potential for harm. It's not a new topic, he'due south been discussing the concept for several years (equally seen in the interview with John Oliver above, though they bear upon multiple topics). I don't look true AI to happen within my own lifetime, but I think Hawking is right to warn against potential risks. This is one thought we ignore at our own peril.

Now read: What are artificial neural networks?